m72 law vs at4
The disadvantage of the recoilless design is that it creates a large back blast area behind the weapon, which can cause severe burns and overpressure injuries to friendly personnel in the vicinity of the user and sometimes even to the users themselves, especially in confined spaces. 2.5kg. While closed, the outer assembly serves as a watertight container for the rocket and the percussion-cap firing mechanism that activates the rocket. The HEDP 502 projectile can penetrate up to 150mm of RHA. [7] The name also doubles as an alpha-phonetic word play on the weapon's role, due to "AT" being a common military abbreviation for "anti-tank". The heavier nose cap allows either to penetrate light walls or windows before exploding, or to be "skipped" off the ground for an air burst. The APILAS is understood to be pretty punishing on the user to fire in terms of both the shock of firing and the noise produced when the rocket is launched. The manufacturers have since made modifications that have solved that problem. The forward folding grip is the only difference between the AT4 adopted by Sweden and the US Army version. The high-penetration projectile has extra penetration ability, which enables it to pass through 500mm to 600mm of RHA. One of the Carl Gustaf's most important features compared to a lot weapons in this list is that it is a fully reusable system that can fire a wide variety of ammunition types, including dedicated anti-tank and high-explosive rounds. The rocket propels the 66mm (2.6in) warhead forward without significant recoil. Avengers M72 Full Metal 1:1 Scale Airsoft Rocket Grenade Launcher But what really puts the M72 ahead is rate of fire. This could be particularly useful for engaging Russian tanks, many of which make heavy use of ERA, in Ukraine. page 90. The Swedish-made Carl Gustaf, which Canada says it plans to send 100 of to Ukraine, is an 84mm recoilless rifle, variants of which have been in service around the world since the 1940s. The 14kg weapon had a claimed penetration of 90 centimetres (35in) RHA,[24] and in 1994 was demonstrated to defeat two NATO Single Heavy targets inclined at 68 degrees from vertical with ERA,[25] for a line-of-sight penetration of 600mm. The fact that the system is highly mobile and simpler to employ can be seen as an advantage in some circumstances compared to Javelin. American production of the weapon began by Hesse-Eastern in 1963, and was terminated by 1983; currently it is produced by Nammo Raufoss AS in Norway and their subsidiary, Nammo Talley, Inc. in Arizona. The AT4 is an 84mm unguided anti-armour weapon manufactured by Saab Bofors Dynamics. Unlike the M72-series LAW, the M136 AT4 launcher need not be extended before firing. accounting. The red firing button has a similar resistance to the trigger pull of a rifle, so the gunner does not have to jab at the firing button, which could throw their aim off. Who needs you, poor Bandera Nazi. With all that in mind, The War Zone has compiled brief profiles of the shoulder-fired missiles, rocket launchers, and recoilless rifles that Ukraine has received in foreign military aid packages so far and the weapons it is expected to receive in the future. It was considered an excellent munition to be used against insurgents firing from close and medium range. Technology, performance and design delivered to your inbox. [13] The Swedish Army also recognized these improvements and subsequently adopted the Americanized version of the AT4 as the Pansarskott m/86 (Pskott m/86), with the addition of a forward folding hand grip to help steady the AT4 when being aimed and fired. These people know what they are talking about, unlike the false propagandists here and, as you can see, the outright Nazis in the comments, who showed their true colors. If firing from the prone position, they must also place their legs well to the side to avoid burning himself. The AT4 is intended to give infantry units a means to destroy or disable armoured fighting vehicles and fortifications, although it is generally ineffective against more modern main battle tanks (MBTs), especially those with reactive armour, unless weaker sections of armour are exploited. The AT4 warhead can penetrate more than 17.5in of armour plate. A number of NATO members, including Poland and Slovakia, still have stocks of Soviet-era weapons that Ukrainian forces might already use, which could make it easier to transfer them and to get them issued out to combat units. The launchers are upgraded to be able to fire multiple times and are armed with M74 incendiary rounds. Its funny you dont even understand how much the rest of the world laughs at you. Unlike the reloadable Javelin, NLAW is a single-shot, self-contained system. All of these had to be used within a few meters of the target, which was difficult and dangerous. But unlike the Carl Gustaf, which uses a heavier and more expensive steel tube with rifling,[15] the disposable AT4 design greatly reduces manufacturing costs by using a reinforced smoothbore fiberglass outer tube. In accordance with the weapon's known limitations, a pair of "tank-buster" troops crawl to a firing position around 50 to 150 meters (160 to 490ft) away from the target, bringing with them four to six LAWs, which are then used in rapid succession until the target is destroyed or incapacitated. It was subsequently reported that these deliveries would most likely include Grom-M/Piorun and that they would be sent first to the United States as part of the transfer process. The AT4 is an 84-mm unguided, anti-armour weapon. Ukraine receives M72 LAW weapon system from Denmark - YouTube 0:00 / 1:40 Ukraine receives M72 LAW weapon system from Denmark Military Coverage 12.9K subscribers 14K views 9 months ago. John Antal. This version uses a saltwater countermass in the rear of the launcher to absorb the back blast; the resulting spray captures and dramatically slows down the pressure wave, allowing troops to fire from enclosed areas. Unlike the heavier Carl Gustaf, the AT4 outer tube is built to take the stress of just one firing; it is not reusable and cannot be reloaded. AT4 or LAW? :: Squad Game Owner Discussion - Steam Community TheM72 LAWhas been used by the Marine Corps since the days of jungle fighting in Vietnam. The problem of back blast was solved with the AT4-CS (Confined Space) version, specially designed for urban warfare. Five different countries Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, and the Netherlands have now sent or are planning on sending shipments of these portable anti-aircraft weapons. Enemies of the Republic beware. The US Army placed a $13.4m order for AT4-CS RS weapon systems in October 2017 with deliveries scheduled for 2019. Weighing only 5.5 pounds and measuring 24.8 inches long folded, the M72 LAW consists of two tubes, the outmost of which is watertight and holds the trigger arming handle, front-rear sights and rear cover. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. These weapons are even capable of being used against low and slow flying helicopters, especially during their terminal operations in and out of landing zones. Effects of the M136 AT4 and M72-series LAW on field fortifications or A member of the Latvia armed forces, at left holding a Stinger training launcher, stands with a member of the Italian military during a recent training exercise. The M72 LAW is the worst AT weapon in the game. The M141 BDM, also known as the Shoulder-Launched Multipurpose Assault Weapon-Disposable (SMAW-D), is a relatively obscure weapon that had seen almost exclusive service with the U.S. military until deliveries began arriving in Ukraine earlier this year.