sample objections to request for production of documents california

/Rotate 0 -6 -24 Td m)-2 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (e)3 ( mi)-4 (c)3 (e)4.1 ( 4029, 4032 )]TJ (21)Tj >> BT by Practical Law Litigation Maintained California A Practice Note explaining how to draft and serve a response to a request for production of documents (RFP) (also called an "inspection demand" or "document request") in a California unlimited civil action. Plaintiff's Responses And Objections To Defendant's Second Request 111.6 0 Td stream Q [(D)2.8 (E)-3.7 (N)2.7 (I)-1.8 (E)-2.9 (S)]TJ /Type /Encoding endobj T* [(c)4 (ont)-2 (a)4 (i)-1.9 (n a)4.5 ( pr)3 (e)-6.7 (c)4.7 (i)-1.9 (se)1.9 ( de)-6.7 (f)3.7 (i)-1.9 (ni)-2.9 (t)-2 (i)-2 (on of)3 ( t)-2 (he)4 ( phr)3.8 (a)3.2 (s)-10.9 (e)4.7 ( a)4 (nd r)-7.7 (e)4.7 (f)3 (e)-5.9 (r)2.9 (e)3.1 (nc)4 (e)4.9 (s )-11.8 (a)3.1 ( va)4.8 (r)3 (i)-11.9 (e)3.1 (t)-11.9 (y)20.7 ( o)-10.7 (f)2.9 ( t)-1.9 (ox)-10 (i)-2 (c)4.7 (i)-2.7 (t)7.9 (y)20 ( )]TJ [(t)-1.1 (um)-2 (or)2.9 (.\224)3.1 ( Mo)-1.6 (ns)-2.7 (a)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (o )]TJ /TT0 12 Tf The above is an example of inappropriate boilerplate objections. In reviewing the response, it is likely you are focusing in on the fact that there are garbage objections to your request and that you werent provided a privilege log. T* /Annots [] >> (3. %PDF-1.7 f [(A)-7.1 (D)1.9 (M)3.1 (IT)-3.9 (S)]TJ [(of)3 ( st)-4 (ud)-9.9 (y)20.7 ( B)6.1 (D)2 (N)2.9 (-)3 (77-)2.2 (42)10.8 (0 w)2 (e)3.2 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( )9.2 (c)4.8 (om)-1.9 (pou)9.1 (nd-)13 (r)3.8 (e)4 (l)-1.9 (a)13.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d. \()2.1 (M)9.9 (O)2 (N)1.1 (G)2.1 (L)21.8 (Y)2 (04276)10 (044)9.2 (\))3.8 ( )-240.7 ([)-6.2 (Th)1.8 (i)8.9 (s)-1.8 ( R)-3 (e)4.8 (q)9.1 (ue)4.9 (s)8.2 (t)-1.9 ( i)-1.2 (s )]TJ 0 -24 TD THIRD: "Relevant non-privileged and non-protected documents". ET [(onc)4 (oge)4.8 (ni)-2.8 (c)4.8 ( i)-1.9 (n m)-2.8 (a)4.7 (l)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( m)-1.9 (i)-2 (c)3.9 (e)3.2 ( )-9.1 (pr)2.9 (oduc)3.1 (in)-12.9 (g)10.8 ( a)3.1 ( dose)-6.8 (-)2 (r)3 (e)4.9 (l)-2.8 (a)4.8 (t)-11.9 (e)3.1 (d )-10 (i)-2 (nc)4.8 (r)3 (e)3.1 (a)4.9 (s)-10.9 (e)3 ( in)-2 ( re)5 (na)4.9 (l)-1.9 ( t)-2.9 (ubul)-2 (e)4.8 ( )-9.9 (a)-6.9 (de)4.8 (nom)-1.9 (a)3.9 (s,)-1.8 ( a)1.3 ( r)-6.1 (a)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( )]TJ endobj 2) my opposing counsel tends to argue that there is no obligation to prepare a privilege log unless it is demanded by the requesting party and I dont think thats right I think its an affirmative duty arising when someone withholds documents under an objection is that right?. /Type /Page /Creator (Aspose Ltd.) /Resources 63 0 R [(M)-1.8 (onsa)2.8 (nt)-12 (o )]TJ All such information, prepared in anticipation of litigation and not disclosed or otherwise maintained in a way that is inconsistent with the purpose of the privilege, is protected by the work product doctrine. T* how to prove . endobj /ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI] /Parent 19 0 R /TT1 12 Tf 23 0 obj 272.03 586.67 139.8 -1.19 re )]TJ endstream x+ | endstream endobj Q 1 g (5)Tj /Parent 15 0 R 60 0 obj )]TJ 3 to refer to "Civil Investigative Demand No. (8)Tj 2. /Type /Page Q (M)Tj /Length 13 0 R 1. (1)Tj [(A)1.9 (D)2.9 (M)4 (IT)-4.8 (S)]TJ T* x%0>7P{Reu1D Responding party objects to this request to the extent it seeks information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and/or work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. >> [(A)-7.1 (D)1.9 (M)3.1 (IT)-3.9 (S)]TJ >> C.C.P. california discovery objections, request for production q /TT0 12 Tf [(M)-1.496 (ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. 0.71 0 l 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm )Tj stream Consequently, there are no individuals and entities who were interviewed by the DOJ pursuant to its "CID" investigation of Dentsply. P)-4.7 (ur)3.7 (su)-1.8 (a)3 (nt)-1.9 ( t)-2 (o )-10 (t)-2 (he)3.1 ( C)-2.1 (a)3.1 (l)-1.9 (i)-1.2 (f)2.1 (or)2.9 (ni)-1.8 (a)3.9 ( C)-3 (ode)4.8 ( )]TJ /content/aba-cms-dotorg/en/groups/litigation/committees/pretrial-practice-discovery/practice/2017/how-to-make-good-objections-to-written-discovery, Make it a lead-off general objection.. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 313.4768 86.2909 Tm EMC 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 4.5757 36 Tm (1)Tj But if you make scant effort to explain why you are right, you might as well not object at all. T* The court then separated the motions to compel from the motions to strike and refused to rule on the motion to strike stating There is no such motion.Is the court correct?. [(g)10.8 (l)-11.9 (y)29.1 (phosa)2.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( )-229 (be)13.9 (t)-1.9 (w)1.9 (e)3.2 (e)13.9 (n )-199 (199)9.9 (1 )-200.8 (t)-2 (h)10.8 (r)3 (oug)10 (h )-209.9 (2017. [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s )]TJ All documents reflecting any verbatim statement of a third party. /Rotate 0 -103.32 -24 Td PDF Free Sample Objections To Request For Production Of Documents Pdf Pdf Q PDF Instructions: Requests for Documents - United States District Court 2030.060(d). The propounding party had placed the definitions of specific terms in a preamble. [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 (, on or)2.9 ( a)4.9 (bout)-2 ( S)-4.8 (e)4.7 (pt)-2.7 (e)4.8 (m)-2 (be)4 (r)2.1 ( 4, 1985, EPA\222)4 (s)-10 ( H)1.9 (a)3.1 (z)-5 (a)3.9 (r)2.1 (d Ev)2 (a)5.9 (l)-2.8 (ua)4.8 (t)-2 (i)-2.8 (on )]TJ (1)Tj In its responses, the defendant asserted boilerplate objections. 32 0 obj 3 to refer to "Civil Investigative Demand No. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Filter /FlateDecode u%-T\=\5j8XZjH6/A Pga$plDW;XSVLiY5$Lz3V.)g[JD?aRP#e)6(]_$^"JcJ*YiMQV /Length 131 0 R T* Practice Guidance: Objections to Discovery Requests | Gavel -332.51 -24 Td BT /Rotate 0 (16)Tj /ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI] << T* [( t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t )-2 (t)-3 (hi)-2.1 (s )-1.8 (d)8.1 (oc)4.9 (um)-2.8 (e)4.8 (nt)-2 ( w)2 (a)3.1 (s c)-6 (r)2.9 (e)3.1 (a)4 (t)-11 (e)3.9 (d )]TJ endobj q /TT0 12 Tf (4. Rule 33 (Interrogatories to Parties) also requires specificity when making objections. [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (D)2.9 (I)-1.7 (N)-7.2 (G)7.1 ( )-9.1 (P)10.9 (A)2 (R)2 (T)-12.9 (Y)1.1 (:)-6.1 ( )-1050.8 (D)1.9 (e)4 (f)-6.9 (e)3.9 (n)-3.9 (d)-3.2 (an)-4.8 (t)3.7 ( M)4 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (A)1.9 (N)2 (T)-2.9 (O)-2 ( C)1.9 (O)-1.9 (M)3.9 (PA)3.2 (N)2 (Y)2 ( )-9.1 ( )]TJ [(D)2 (i)-2 (vi)-1.1 (si)-4 (on, MON)2.8 (G)-8.7 (L)21.7 (Y)2 (042)-10.8 (76044-)2.9 (47, st)-3.7 (a)4.7 (t)-2.8 (e)4.8 (s )-1.8 (\223)3 (R)-2.9 (e)3 (na)4 (l)-1.8 ( t)-12 (ubul)-2.1 (e)4 ( a)4.8 (de)3.1 (nomas o)-1.7 (c)-6 (c)3 (ur)3 (r)-6 (e)3 (d)-9.9 ( i)-2 (n . ( )Tj Plaintiff objects to each instruction, definition, document request, and interrogatory to the extent that it purports to impose any requirement or discovery obligation greater than or different from those under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the applicable Rules and Orders of the Court. [(77-)3 (4)10.8 (20)10 (, di)-1.9 (d not)-2.9 ( r)3.8 (e)4 (por)2.1 (t)-1.9 ( a)4 ( )10 (ki)-1.1 (dne)-6.9 (y)20.8 ( )19.2 (t)-1.9 (um)-2 (or)2.9 ( f)3.8 (o)-9.9 (r)2.1 ( c)4 (ont)-1.9 (r)2.9 (ol)-1.9 ( a)-5.2 (ni)7 (m)-1.8 (a)4.7 (l)-2.7 ( N)2.7 (o. 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re T* /Filter /FlateDecode 214.8 0 Td Did I think this was ok or not? /Parent 15 0 R T* stream )2 (11)2 ( in )9.1 (P)-4.8 (l)-2 (a)14 (i)-1.9 (n)10.7 (t)7.1 (i)8.9 (f)2.2 (f)3 (s\222)1.8 ( A)11.1 (m)-1.8 (e)4.7 (n)9.2 (de)4.8 (d a)3.2 (nd S)6 (up)9.9 (ple)11 (men)11.9 (t)-1.9 (a)3 (l )7.9 (R)-3.8 (e)14 (que)4.8 (s)8.1 (t)8.9 (s )-1.8 (f)1.1 (or)3 ( )10 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (ss)-3 (i)-2 (ons)-1.8 ( \()3.7 (J)-10.9 (une)3 ( )]TJ PDF Discovery request for production of documents or things 29.4 648.61 Td Subject to the above objections, Plaintiff has no responsive documents in its possession, custody, or control, other than those that have already been produced to Defendant and those being produced as verbatim statements of a third party in response to Request No. T* [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( EP)-1.2 (A )2 (i)9.9 (nf)3 (or)13 (m)-1.9 (e)13.9 (d Mo)7.2 (nsa)12.1 (nt)8.9 (o on J)-11.8 (ul)-12 (y)29.9 ( )30.9 (29, 1)-10 (985, t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t )-2 (a)2 (f)3 (t)-1.9 (e)4.8 (r)3 ( E)11 (P)-4.8 (A)1.9 (\222)13 (s )]TJ [(da)4 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d 9/)-2 (4/)-2 (84 f)2.9 (r)3.9 (om)-2.7 ( W)-6.1 (i)-1.1 (l)-2 (l)-2 (i)-2.8 (a)13.8 (m)-1.9 ( D)-7.1 (y)19 (kst)-2.8 (r)2.1 (a)4.8 (, P)-4.7 (h.D)1.9 (., To)1.8 (x)-8.1 (i)-2 (c)-6.9 (ol)-2 (og)-10 (y)20.8 ( )-10.8 (B)7 (r)3.8 (a)3.1 (n)-9.9 (c)4.8 (h, EP)-2.8 (A)2.8 ( H)2 (a)3.1 (z)-5 (a)-6.9 (r)3 (d E)1.8 (va)4 (l)-1.9 (ua)3.1 (t)-1.1 (i)-2 (on )]TJ Quality objectives. /TT0 9.96 Tf (16)Tj Start early. [(MON)3.8 (G)-7 (L)10.1 (Y)2.8 (04276044-)3 (47, )-10.7 (s)-1.1 (t)-1.1 (a)3 (t)-1.9 (e)4 (s,)-2 ( \223)2.8 (R)-3.7 (e)4.7 (na)3.2 (l)-1.1 ( t)-2 (ubul)-2 (e)3.9 ( a)3.2 (d)-10 (e)-6 (nom)-1.1 (a)3 (s )-1.8 (oc)2.1 (c)4.9 (ur)2.1 (r)-6 (e)3.9 (d i)-1.9 (n . T* Plaintiff further objects to this request, whether broadly or more narrowly construed, to the extent it seeks production of documents protected by the work product doctrine, the governmental deliberative process privilege, or the attorney-client privilege. [(l)-1.1 (i)-2 (st)-4.9 (e)4.8 (d a)3.1 (s )-1.8 (No)2 (. 0 0 612 792 re Q Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o a)4 (l)-2 (so)-2 ( )]TJ

Cedar Grove Nj Police Contract, How Many Bundles Are In A Presidential Shingle Square, Bennie Thompson Fraternity, 5 Qualities Of A Good Poster, Articles S